Showing posts with label Bloomsbury. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bloomsbury. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

James Runcie: Writing Grantchester

Today I welcome James RuncieJames Runcie is a writer, director, and literary curator. He is the author of The Grantchester Mysteries, visiting Professor at Bath Spa University, and a fiction reviewer for The Independent. The Grantchester Mysteries (Bloomsbury) have been adapted to become the ITV/PBS Masterpiece series GRANTCHESTER starring James Norton, Robson Greene, Morven Christie, Pheline Roggan, Tessa Peake-Jones and Al Weaver. The Grantchester Mysteries: Full time priest, part time detective, Sidney Chambers is England's most loveable sleuthing vicar.

JAMES RUNCIE: 
WRITING GRANTCHESTER 

Why set your mystery in the past? When forensic techniques today are so advanced, communication is easier and the pace of life is so much speedier, why might a writer want to go back to a slower age with narrower social mobility and limited opportunities for contemporary relevance?

I set out to write the six book series The Grantchester Mysteries (now showing on PBS as Grantchester) as a flow of books that would explore the social history of England after the Second World War. The plan was to trace the beginnings of the modern age with crime as a kind of prototype Aston Martin to drive the action from the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II in 1953 to her Silver Jubilee in 1977.
It’s almost inconceivable now to consider what life in Britain was like at that time. In the 1950’s the death penalty was still extant, homosexuality was illegal, women’s career opportunities were limited, and the contraceptive pill had yet to be invented. There was food rationing, very few people owned a telephone or a television, and most homes had lost a beloved relative in the fight against fascism. Put crime and family history into this mix and you start to see the extraordinary changes that have been made in the last sixty years: the chasm between then and now.

The past overshadows the present. Researching it requires patience, diligence and a fair degree of foot-slogging. In The Grantchester Mysteries, I have a hero, Canon Sidney Chambers, who is a vicar in the English village of Grantchester, just outside Cambridge, and it starts six years before I was born. As the son of a clergyman, I remember what it was like for my father to be at the moral heart of a small community in which seasonal, religious and agricultural rhythms ran together. I recall how shocking it was whenever there was a death or an accident and how important the role was of priest and doctor to be there for the key rites of passage of birth, marriage and death – just as it is today.

And so, when I am writing a scene set in the 1950’s, I try to imagine and behave as Sidney Chambers might have done. I have the same breakfast (a pot of tea, boiled egg and soldiers – sorry, very English I know) and then I read exactly the same newspaper he read; which is to say I read The Times online for the particular day in 1955 I might be writing about. I look up the prayers Sidney will have said, follow his Bible readings and imagine how and where he might have journeyed and who he might have visited throughout the day: because it’s my belief that only when you can root characters in a particular situation that they come to life. And perhaps it’s only then that you realise how radically different their lives are from today and only then that you can explore (and enjoy) the potent disconnect between past and present – bringing fictional characters into the reading now, with all their limitations, failings and complexities.

Because my dead father was a priest, I suppose this is a way, in part, of keeping him alive too. He wasn’t a detective, and he would have been horrified by the idea of being one, but I hope he would have liked the way in which the mystery genre is flexible enough to allow an infinite number of moral possibilities. It lets the reader go anywhere and test any character in order to find out what they are really like. Because it’s only when good people are challenged that we find out what they are really like (rather than what they say they believe); and it must be part of the point of writing mysteries to examine how and why people behave badly, act desperately, and commit appalling acts. Then the good that remain have to ask certain questions: ‘What can be done to bring criminals to justice in as understanding a way as possible? How can we hate the sin but love the sinner?’

That is the Christian way. Even though it may be unfashionable to think like this in today’s speedy, aggressive, immediate and challenging moral climate perhaps there are values that exist outside time. Perhaps there is a different way to think about human character, morality, love and survival – one that is still grounded in tradition but which helps us to learn how life might be better - and how much we have to preserve the fragile and yet precious bonds between us all.

Monday, September 21, 2015

Dashiell Hammett & the Missing Clue: Guest post by Nathan Ward

Today I welcome Nathan Ward, author of The Lost Detective: Becoming Dashiell Hammett (Bloomsbury, September). He has written for the New York Times, Village Voice, Wall Street Journal, and other publications and was an editor and writer at American Heritage. Ward is the author of Dark Harbor: The War for the New York Waterfront (FSG, 2010). Ward is on tour this month. Be sure and check the schedule. Thanks, Nathan, for stopping by Mystery Fanfare.

Nathan Ward:
Dashiell Hammett & The Missing Clue

There was much to discourage writing a book about Samuel Dashiell Hammett’s elusive early years, which is perhaps why one didn’t exist when I went looking for it to read. Hammett’s early life did not offer much of a paper trail for a biographer to follow—far fewer letters than you’d want, certainly no diary, and since he did not start writing anything until his late twenties, there wasn’t the usual collection of youthful poems and manuscripts to pick over.

I typically like learning the story behind the art—for instance, that Picasso was possibly inspired by childhood memories of a Spanish earthquake and fire when he composed his masterwork Guernica, or what was the true criminal story behind the film On the Waterfront. But in the case of Hammett, much as I loved his stories and novels, it was skepticism that first drew me to investigate his early background as a Pinkerton. He was presented as a sort of late-blooming accidental artist, someone who took up writing out of necessity and then led a revolution in crime writing. This myth was hard to fathom, though appealing. “I decided to become a writer,” he recalled in 1929. “It was a good idea. Having had no experience whatever in writing, except writing letters and reports, I wasn’t handicapped by exaggerated notions of the difficulties ahead.”

The dispatches (known as op reports) he had written as a Pinkerton detective comprised his professional writing experience before 1922, when he began sending out his first stories. But his actual reports themselves have never been found. What there was was an intriguing myth, what in comic books is called an origins story: young man contracts tuberculosis, becomes incapacitated out of detecting work and, desperate to feed his family, decides to try writing crime stories based on his former experiences. The full biographies, like cross-country trains, could not afford to stop very long at this station of Hammett’s life on their way to Hollywood and Lillian, McCarthy and the sad end. They had so much else to cover. I decided that by concentrating on his youth and transition, a sort of Portrait of the Artist as a Young Pinkerton, I might have the room to really understand this vital but murky period—if there was anything to find.

Just as the Kansas City Star (with its famous style sheet requiring short sentences and vigorous English) helped shape the prose of the young Ernest Hemingway, out of the scores of men trained as Pinkertons, one emerged from the Agency able to make something entirely new from his experiences. “Detecting has its high spots,” Hammett recalled in the twenties, “but the run of the work is the most monotonous that any one could imagine. The very things that can be made to sound the most exciting in the telling are in the doing usually the most dully tiresome.” His deeper skills lay in that telling.

How good a detective had he been? What sort of jobs did he perform as a Pinkerton? No one had ever said except for Hammett himself, who once claimed his reputation within the agency was higher than it should have been because of the quality of his reports. I believe that. The written record was indeed pretty skimpy; most of the stories of his Pinkerton cases were expansively told only by Hammett himself, and the lore grew over time. Was the San Francisco cable car robbery his last case? Did he really find a stolen ferris wheel? And, if he was so sick during this time, how could you find out when he was too ill to work as a detective? I needed something to serve as a chronology, a way of keeping track of him through time as I investigated. The Army, in which he had first contracted tuberculosis in 1918 (discharged, early 1919) kept track of his health for years afterward as he was examined to determine his disability. His Army medical file laid out a biography of Hammett’s illness, which turned out to be one reliable way of keeping tabs on him through his vagabond days: Where he lived month to month, how he seemed physically and thus what kind of work he was fit for, what he told each visiting nurse he was doing for money (for instance, did he brag to her about selling stories?) and where his wife and children lived year to year.

For years there was only one document extant (found by the private detective and Hammett scholar David Fechheimer) in which Hammett gave his profession as a Pinkerton op. But online I was able to not only track his listed addresses from year to year (even if they sometimes lagged behind where he was living), I found his draft card, where he gave his profession as ‘Private Detective,’ and (through Google books) I discovered the works and portrait of the real Mr. Flitcraft, the insurance publisher whose name Hammett lifted for his famous story within Maltese Falcon. Most interesting to me, however, was the 1900 census, taken when the Hammetts lived in Philadelphia: It was probably his mother Annie who came to the door of their row house at 2942 Poplar Street, since the census taker recorded the address was then home to three children: Reba, Richard, and a six-year-old middle child, “Dashell.” Hammett’s evolution from Sam to Dashiell is not a straight line, but his mother certainly called him Dashiell (Da-SHEEL) as a small boy, although he was known to most everyone else by his first name, Sam, until the late twenties, when he became the literary figure Dash Hammett, and donated his name (and his San Francisco apartment at 891 Post Street) to Sam Spade, who lives there still.

After three years, I felt that the myth of how he went from real detective to writer of detective books was roughly true. But, in writing about Hammett’s transition there were two major items I would have given anything to find and couldn't—even now in the time when someone’s death certificate, draft card, passport applications, and even embarrassing high school yearbooks all end up online. Obviously, I would have loved to find his missing op reports (and I learned a lot about the Pinkerton life during Hammett’s tenure by reading hundreds of op reports by other detectives). The other document I would have loved to have was seemingly small but might have gone far toward filling in the gaps in those early years when, sick in his apartment, he taught himself how to write—improving story by story and stubbornly freeing his gift. His library card would have given stamped evidence of what precisely he was reading week by week (Henry James, Wilkie Collins, Ford Maddox Ford, various criminologists) while he started writing stories for magazines. It would have deepened the picture.

Here and there in later years, Hammett would mention books that had inspired him, telling James Thurber, for instance, that there were elements of Henry James’s Wings of the Dove in his Maltese Falcon, but a successful man recalling his lofty influences is not the same as the stamped, dated titles on a library card. In Hammett’s story “The Tenth Clew,” the op ends up throwing out much of his evidence in order to make a fresh start and solve the crime. In a similar vein, in trying to solve the mystery of Dashiell Hammett, I would have traded some superfluous information—a couple of the early jobs he was fired from, perhaps, before he walked into the Pinkerton offices in Baltimore in 1915-- for that reader’s card. It was probably tossed years ago, but it haunts me as a clue that got away.