***
“People pick up a novel because of the plot. They keep reading because of the characters.”
This was the sage advice I received from an editor when I first moved from travel writing to crime fiction. I’d worked as a travel writer for many years, and although it shares a lot of similarities with fiction—a central protagonist, a journey, a sense of place, the artful use of the telling detail—travel writing was still constrained, at least partly, by the truth. If I was writing a memoir about hitchhiking across Japan or walking across Northern Ireland, I could tweak the timeline, juggle events, exaggerate some of the encounters for comedic effect, but I couldn’t, say, kill someone along the way just to liven things up. Not unless I really did it, which would have been frowned upon.
In contrast, crime fiction—or murder mysteries, or detective stories, or thrillers, or cozies, or whichever iteration you prefer--requires a corpse. Impossible crimes, or “locked room” mysteries as they are known, fascinated me. These are the ultimate puzzle mysteries, not so much a whodunit? as a “How’d they do it?” John Dickson Carr was the master of the locked room mystery, outselling Agatha Christie in his day, yet he is now all but forgotten, while Christie’s novels continue to be read, adapted, celebrated. Why? The problem lies in the nature of the locked room genre itself. Carr’s plots involve complex solutions that are often too clever by half. He gets so caught up in the mechanics of it that he forgets the human element. He tends to employ stock characters—the sassy flapper, the harumphing British uncle, the reclusive wealthy heir—to the detriment of the story itself. Christie’s characters are more layered, more eccentric, more contradictory. It’s why she is still read and Carr, for the most part, is not. It was a lesson I took to heart.
I’d become obsessed with a news story I misread while living in Japan. A young woman, working as a hostess in a club on the fourth floor of a bar building, had gone missing. Her friends came by to meet her at the elevator after her shift, but she had, in their words, “disappeared.” They meant it figuratively. When they showed up, she was already gone. She had “disappeared.” The story ended tragically, but that initial misunderstanding on my part stayed with me. How could someone disappear from inside an elevator?
And from these characters came the heart of the story. Officer Shimada and the Disappearing Girl is meant to be that rarest of creatures: a character-driven impossible crime novel. I leave it to readers to decide whether it succeeds.


No comments:
Post a Comment