Showing posts with label Cathy Pickens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cathy Pickens. Show all posts

Monday, July 22, 2024

Razor Girl: True Crime Guest Post by Cathy Pickens


The newspaper headline screamed in large typeface: 


“Jealous Wife Uses Razor to Slay Husband. 

Laughs About Crime from Behind Bars of Cell. 

Head Cut Almost Off. 

‘Women and Liquor’ Blamed for Tragedy at Former Site of Camp Greene.”

A “family brawl” at a small clapboard house near a dismantled World War I boot camp became one of Charlotte, North Carolina’s trials of the century—thanks to the bubbly, chatty, tiny young defendant who admitted almost decapitating her bigamous husband. The case had everything 1920’s news headlines craved: a female killer, a gruesome murder, illegal liquor, a flirty woman with a scandalously bobbed haircut, a philandering husband, high-profile lawyers and erudite experts showing off new science. 

By the 1920s, Charlotte had been through a dramatic transformation from small inland transportation hub set at the crossroads of two major Native American trading trails to the largest textile mill center in the region, stealing the title “largest city” from the regional ports of Wilmington and Charleston, South Carolina. The large factories attracted workers and their families from piedmont and mountain farms in every direction.

As with other industrializing cities in the U.S., newcomers moving in found hard work—which they were used to on the farm—but steadier, if meager, pay and usually more modernized housing. In addition to their work ethic, rural folks brought with them skills for making or connections back home for obtaining moonshine—good to have during Prohibition. And more people congregating in town meant more opportunities for speakeasies or “blind tigers” and partying, debauchery and crime.

Nineteen-year-old Nellie Greene Freeman earned $15 a week working ten- to twelve-hour days at Charlotte’s Nebel Knitting Mill making silk hosiery. She had married twenty-one-year-old Alton Freeman only five months earlier, not knowing he was already twice-married (though not divorced) and not knowing he would seldom be gainfully employed. The newlyweds had no alternative but to live in the same house with Alton’s family. 

On May 22, 1926, Alton told Nellie he was going to pull off a liquor heist to get a stake. She didn’t like that idea. Fine, he said as he packed his bag. He would leave her. She tried to sweet talk him out of his angry bravado, but he “answered by a hiss” and said, “I hate you.”

Later, inside her cell at the police station, Nellie wasn’t at all reticent about describing to reporters what happened. She had a folded straight razor in her dress pocket. “I slipped it into my hand, threw my arms around his neck and cut him.” The newspaper printed her comments on the front page the day after the killing. “I didn’t intend to kill him,” she said. “I just meant to teach him a lesson.”

When Rural Policeman R.W. Goforth arrived at the house, he found Alton Freeman dead on the kitchen floor; “his head appeared to be completely severed except for a small portion of skin and flesh in the back of the neck.” Nellie was allowed to change out of her bloody dress before she, her dress and her straight razor were taken downtown.

The newspaper reported the next day that, by “a strange trick of fate,” Nellie shared a cell with “pretty Georgia Inge,” who was under arrest for being publicly drunk and for having a pint of illegal alcohol tucked in the “bosom of her dress.” She had threatened a $40,000 lawsuit for the humiliation of being searched (about $700,000 today) and to do away with herself rather than serve a thirty-day term in the Mecklenburg Industrial Home. However, despite her well-bred upbringing, Miss Inge was “not perturbed because of sharing her quarters with a slayer.” Six months later, at the end of her six-month sentence, Miss Inge married a young man well-known about town, and the city paper reported the nuptials held at, of all places, the Mecklenburg Industrial Home. 

By the time of former cellmate Georgia Inge’s wedding, Nellie’s tribulations too had passed. From her arrest in May to her trial in July, she spent time chatting with visiting reporters, singing and dancing in her cell and alternately laughing and crying as she studied a box of family photos.

State’s attorney Frank McNinch—a former city mayor, the brother of a former mayor and soon to be head of the Federal Trade Commission—had vowed to see the end of women getting away with murder, as had happened in a recent case of a wife wielding an ax on her abusive husband. Nellie, though, had attracted some of the best defense lawyers in town, no matter she couldn’t afford to pay them. They brought in a psychiatrist or “alienist” who testified that Nellie was little more than a child who hadn’t intended to hurt her husband and who had no idea what had happened until after it was over. “I think she is shot through and through with unsoundness,” said Dr. James K. Hall. “Her mental condition would become more unsound under stress.” 

Nellie remained calm throughout, even during her own testimony and cross-examination. Describing her “bobbed hair and flashing brown eyes,” the headlines captured the essence of her testimony: “‘I didn’t have it in my heart to kill him. I wanted to teach him a lesson and make him a better man,’ diminutive child-widow dramatically tells court jury.”

In a sweltering July courtroom, the all-male jury deliberated into a second day. The first vote had been split: one for second-degree murder, four for manslaughter and seven for acquittal. Returning to deliberate for a second day, they shared some Bible verses on forgiveness and the holdouts came around. They agreed that she’d been temporarily insane and therefore was not guilty.

After the verdict, Nellie announced that she was “through with men,” and she left town to stay with relatives in Kentucky. The judge allowed her to take her razor and her dress with her.

Almost a century later, journalist David Aaron Moore reported that one year after her trial, Nellie remarried, returned to Charlotte and began a life raising their three children, attending church and taking care of her husband and home in northwest Charlotte. She died on May 22, 1969, at age 64, after more than forty years of a quiet, happy marriage.

In 2013, her son Robert told the journalist about trolley rides his mom would take him and his siblings on to visit an older couple on the north side of Charlotte. “I remember we visited a few times. I never knew their names, but there seemed to be a genuine affection between them. I’m convinced that was the Freemans”—Alton’s parents or family.

Over time, Charlotte’s textile mills closed or moved overseas, and the abandoned Nebel Knitting Mill became the Spaghetti Warehouse restaurant in 1991, one of the first businesses to begin the transformation of the old warehouse and mill districts. Southern chivalry slowly vanished, and women eventually earned the right to be tried equally for their crimes without solicitous treatment or the convenience of being struck temporarily crazy as a viable defense. Newspapers stopped reporting trials with scintillating detail—and courtrooms got air-conditioning. When Nellie died over forty years after the trial, few in Charlotte knew that the wife and mother living in the Enderly Park neighborhood was the woman whose trial had packed a humid July courtroom and attracted hot-dog vendors and sellers of commemorative Nellie Freeman straight-razor pins. 

Old crimes can do more than recount just another ordinary, oft-repeated domestic tragedy. Historic cases can illustrate where a city or a region started, how it changed, how its crimes were shaped by the city—and how its crimes in turn shaped the city’s unique flair or flavor.

But old crimes can too easily disappear, taking with them a glimpse into how people loved and fought, survived or died, made their way or wasted their chances. Without the efforts of journalists like David Aaron Moore and research librarians like Shelia Bumgarner at the Charlotte Library, Nellie’s story could have disappeared beneath the continual accumulation of later “crimes of the century.” Likely no one would remember Razor Girl, but her case aptly highlights that time in the 1920s when young women started to move away from their families to find work in factories, and bobbed their hair and shortened their hemlines. Cities were growing, Prohibition took partying to a criminal level, criminal court reporters chatted with defendants in their cells and shared details about what female defendants wore to trial. Those reading the newspapers—and even small cities had more than one—could feel as though they had a seat on the front row.

I was one of those young women who moved from a small town to Charlotte forty years ago. I’ve written about countless crime cases in the Carolinas and across the South, but of all the stories, Razor Girl is still the “old crime” that speaks the most about where Charlotte came from and what we tend to forget, a century later.

 

References

 

“Jealous Wife Uses Razor to Slay Husband.” Charlotte Observer, May 23, 1926, 1, 11.
 
Moore, David Aaron. “The story of Nellie Freeman, aka ‘Razor Girl.’” Creative Loafing, Sept. 9, 1927. http://clclt.com/theclog/archives/2013/09/27/question-the-queen-city-the-story-of-nellie-freeman-aka-razor-girl.
 
Pickens, Cathy. Charlotte True Crime Stories. History Press, 2020.
 
“‘Razor Girl’ is Freed: Nellie Freeman Calm as She Hears Verdict Long Delayed By Jury; Jury Reaches Verdict After Many Prayers.” Charlotte News, July 20, 1926, 1.


****

 

Cathy Pickens is the author of the Blue Ridge Mountain Mysteries (Joffe Books) and a History Press series on Carolina true crime stories, including Charlotte, Raleigh, the Outer Banks, and the Western North Carolina mountains. She writes a continuing column on True Crime for Mystery Readers Journal

  

Thursday, March 23, 2023

LIVING IN A BOOKSTORE: Guest Post by Cathy Pickens


Cathy Pickens: 
Living in a Bookstore

What reader wouldn’t say yes! to living in a bookstore? 
 
On my one visit to Paris, I naturally made the obligatory visit to Shakespeare and Company, the legendary English-language bookshop in the shadow of Notre Dame, the place that Hemingway “liberated” after Paris was reclaimed by the Allies in World War II. The place where thousands of authors have camped on beds tucked between books or set up after hours on top of book tables, a place to live a while and to write.
 
But much closer to home, in the Southern hill country near where I grew up, is Shakespeare’s American cousin. In 1999, Katherine Willoughby opened Shakespeare & Co. Books in Highlands, North Carolina. This was no random knock-off of the name. In her younger days, Katherine lived with owner George Whitman in the Paris store. And he gave permission for her to use to name to create its echo tucked on a plateau at 4117 feet above sea level in the Blue Ridge Mountains.
 
Over the years, I stopped in every time I visited Highlands—a beautifully historic town with an interesting mix of wealthy incomers and those whose families farmed the area since the 1800s. In my experience, used bookshop owners and used bookshop habitués tend to be introverted folks, focused on books and respecting the space of others equally devoted. I exchanged greetings with Katherine as I checked out, but little more. I remember the books I bought there—favorites being Arthur Koestler’s The Act of Creation, discovered while I was locked away in Highlands working on my book CREATE!, and The Blue Guides England, with a spidery inscription: Margaret M. (her book) why?
 
In 2019, I decided to spend more time in the mountains. Summers in Charlotte feel increasingly hot and oppressive to me. Why not go home to the mountains more often, while I’m still able to race my Mustang up the winding roads?
 
On a visit, Stuart Ferguson greeted me from the desk at the front door. He introduced himself as Katherine’s viceroy. Over frequent visits, he encouraged me to renew my acquaintance with the charms of Golden Age mysteries. We talked about our personal histories around Highlands. And, when Katherine couldn’t return from Florida last summer, he invited my husband and me to live upstairs for the winter, to keep the place heated. 
 
Yes. Again, who wouldn’t say yes? 
 
About that time, my true crime book on the North Carolina Appalachian Mountains was published. And I was working on a Southern true crime book for Books-A-Million covering cases Texas to the Virginias. What a wonderful place to hide out and work.
 
At the store, we don’t have to sleep on the book tables. Katherine kept a spacious apartment upstairs. But one door opens directly into the children’s and history sections upstairs. And we’re allowed to roam around downstairs even at night if we run out of anything to read. 
 
When we finish reading a book that we don’t want to keep, we tuck it on the shelf in the store for another reader to find. As the wind blew or the sun lit up the sitting room or the day the snow fell (but, sadly, didn’t stick), we sat in front of the bow window, we read or wrote and enjoyed how magical it all was.
 
A mystery book club held its inaugural gathering in February, to talk about why we’re fascinated with mysteries and crime. In March, for a “read-around” of Agatha Christie, everyone chose one of her mysteries or a biography or her memoirs and we explored the Queen of Crime. Next, we’ll move across the pond to look at the origins of the hard-boiled detective.
 
As a writer, living in the bookstore has shown me up close the life of a bookseller. The people who exclaim, “I just downloaded that book to my Kindle!” Or who say, “Oh, that’s too expensive. I’ll check online.” Stuart stocks a small selection of well-reviewed new books—but what if no one wants to buy the new Putin biography? Or what of the people who’ve written a book and don’t understand that book signings typically end up costing the store money? Or the well-meaning folks who would be hurt if you didn’t take their donated truckload of old textbooks that you’ll have to haul off?
 
Even among readers, not many realize the difficult finances of the book business. The margins are small. In an expensive resort town, the taxes and insurance are high. The salaries are abysmal. But the chance to stop by on a cloudy day and talk about what you’ve read lately? Or to have Stuart find for you a lovely copy of the fantasy novel that started you on your life’s reading journey when you were a kid? Or to pick up a local history or a Georgette Heyer you’d forgotten? There’s magic in that, the kind of magic a bookstore—especially a used bookstore—offers.

True, not everyone gets to live in a bookstore. But everyone can visit. And everyone can help make sure those magical places are there for a while more.
 
Keep in mind the struggles—albeit as labors of love—of your favorite booksellers. Online and e-books certainly have their place. But the places that sell books—the places where you first found your life-long favorites or started your reading journey—those places need you to come visit. Maybe chat about books. Buy a book. Or a stack of books. You want that place to be there the next time you come to visit.
 
***

A former president of Sisters in Crime, Cathy Pickens’s Malice Award-winning series has been re-issued by Joffe Books in the U.K. She also writes a series for History Press on historical Carolinas true crime cases and is fact crime columnist for Mystery Readers Journal.

Friday, August 26, 2016

The Mid-Atlantic Does Murder: True Crimes by Cathy Pickens

Mystery Readers Journal changed up its themes for 2016, but not before our True Crime columnist Cathy Pickens submitted her column. Rather than wait until we add Mid-Atlantic Mysteries to our line-up, I thought I'd post this great article.

 Cathy Pickens’ mystery series started with the St. Martin’s Malice Domestic-award winning Southern Fried. She conducts popular workshops on developing the creative process and developed a program to teach jail inmates how to start their own businesses.

Cathy Pickens:
The Mid-Atlantic Does Murder  

In the diverse and densely populated mid-Atlantic states, what’s a better illustration of their crime history than cases open to continuing speculation?

Sex, Drugs, Rock & Roll 

In 1979, when parents enrolled their children in Philadelphia Mainline’s Upper Merion High School, they didn’t expect the kind of education or the educators they got. Bear-like Bill Bradfield, the English and Latin teacher, had a live-in teacher-girlfriend, plus other girlfriends (some married) for added entertainment.

The principal, Dr. Jay Smith, was an Army Reserve colonel with a rigid manner and subscriptions to swinger and porn magazines.

In a swirl of sexual experimentation and drama, free love became establishment at Upper Merion High School.

What created such a bubbling stew of sexual intrigue? A sign of the ‘70s? A confluence of personalities around a master manipulator?

It was all fun and games until someone ended up dead in a car trunk.

The body of English teacher Susan Reinert, wrapped in chains, was found in her car trunk in the parking lot of a Harrisburg grocery store. The story exploded over national news as the tangled facts slowly unwound: Reinert had divorced her husband, was having an affair with fellow teacher Bradfield, who was living with yet another teacher. Her young children—ages 10 and 11—were missing and, tragically, have never been found. Reinert had been beaten and later injected with a fatal dose of morphine.

Was Bill Bradfield a pied piper of perversion? Many who followed the case thought so.

Was principal Smith—the military man—a hired killer? Or a deranged man seeking vengeance on a quiet teacher for unnamed reasons? He had, after all, been convicted of robbing two Sears stores, disguised as an armored car guard.

Was Reinert killed for the $700,000 life insurance policy benefitting Bradfield? Did Smith, living out a macho fantasy, commit the murder or was his involvement just another Bradfield con job?

Two books (one written by Joseph Wambaugh), a TV movie, and a memoir written by principal Jay Smith rehashed the details, but the motives remain murky.

Did Wambaugh’s involvement skew the investigation and the trial results? An appellate court believed it might. Documents later found in the effects of a state trooper who investigated the case showed that Wambaugh had paid at least one officer more than a trooper’s annual salary for inside information on the investigation.

Smith’s attorney William Costopoulos got him off death row after six years, then got him out of prison. The court held the prosecution had withheld evidence possibly helpful to Smith and thereby created double jeopardy. Smith could never be retried.

Did Smith kill Reinert? He says no, in a self-published book detailing the holes he saw in the prosecution case. Smith died in 2009 at age 80.

Was Bradfield a gifted con artist who found the right pawns and victims all gathered in one place? Was he also a murderer? Or simply the orchestra leader? He was at Cape May with other teachers during that deadly holiday weekend. Did any of his companions conspire with him? Did he hire a murderous thug (with money he’d supposedly invested for Susan Reinert but which he’d kept)?

In 1998, Bradfield died in prison at age 64, fifteen years into his sentence. After weaving lots of wild stories about how Smith was going to kill Reinert and how he didn’t know she’d left him her insurance policy, Bradfield remained quiet about what really happened. Despite books and movies and loads of speculation, the facts remain a mystery—at surely one of the wildest high school English departments ever.

High Tech—1904-Style 

In 1904, decades before the classic hardboiled P.I. novel debuted, a murder mystery suited for a twisty crime novel unfolded in Charlottesville, Virginia.

J. Samuel McCue, former mayor of Charlottesville and a successful lawyer, returned home from church one evening with his wife.

He’d started upstairs, then turned to get something he’d left downstairs. His wife Fannie continued past him up the stairs—where she met a masked man with a gun. In the dim light, he shot her, ran downstairs, and smashed out a large back window to escape.

Former mayor McCue had little faith in the police chief, so he sought help from Roanoke private investigator W. G. Baldwin. The PI surveyed the scene—the upstairs landing where she died, the shattered window, the torn spider web outside the window where the gunman had escaped.

As Baldwin examined the ground outside the window, he saw the glint of metal—a small ring with a broken screw attached, the lanyard ring from a gun.

While Baldwin searched, McCue was in his study packing his briefcase. Even in his grief, he couldn’t ignore clients who needed him. He also needed to stop by the bank, he told Baldwin, to get his will from the safe deposit box. His wife—and only heir—was now dead, so he needed to change his will. He was a lawyer, after all. Such details were his bread and butter.

PI Baldwin accompanied him on his walk to the bank, on his way to see the police chief.

The chief handed Baldwin the unusual bullets taken from Mrs. McCue’s body.

Back at McCue’s office, Baldwin asked him the delicate but obvious question: Do you have any enemies? You were first on the stairs. The bullets were meant for you.

McCue named two men with whom he’d had difficulties, including Reginald Evans, who’d accused McCue of seducing his wife while meeting with her about divorcing Evans.

As any devoted detective would, McCue followed the leads. Mrs. Evans was indeed a looker, but the Evanses had reconciled.

McCue then went to the telephone office to call a gun expert about the odd bullets and the lanyard ring. He chatted up Miss Virginia Bragg, the telephone operator, then continued to follow leads to their dead-ends.

Later, Miss Bragg called him at his hotel to report an unusual phone call former mayor McCue had placed. As she checked to make sure the call connected properly, she’d heard just enough: a woman telling McCue to “send the money now.”

Baldwin, suspecting blackmail, asked Miss Bragg to find out who and where McCue was calling.

He then visited his client and asked if he had any personal skeletons he needed to tell him about. McCue drew himself up in all his Victorian dignity: “Certainly not.”

Baldwin quickly cracked the case: thanks to the lead from Miss Bragg, Baldwin found that McCue had a beautiful woman stashed in a Washington hotel—none other than Hattie Evans.

Mr. Evans was an Englishman and owned an English Webley revolver. The bullets and the lanyard ring both came from a Webley revolver—an unusual weapon for anyone in that area to own. Evans said his revolver had disappeared from his desk.

Hattie Evans told Baldwin she’d given McCue her husband’s gun, afraid her husband might act on his jealous suspicions and do something foolish.

Baldwin searched his client’s house for the revolver. He found a dusty envelope in McCue’s desk: McCue’s Last Will and Testament. Going through jacket pockets in McCue’s closet, he found no gun but did get his fingers tangled up in fibers stuck on one jacket. He carefully folded the jacket and took it with him.

He asked the police chief what McCue was wearing the night of his wife’s murder. The chief described the jacket Baldwin had taken from the closet—the jacket with the sticky spider web on it. The killer had run through a spider web escaping through the garden window.

Why did McCue hire Baldwin to “solve” his wife’s murder? For the same narcissistic reason he walked with his PI to visit his safe deposit box. McCue didn’t go there to get his will—that was dusty and stuffed in a desk drawer at home. He didn’t get anything out. Instead, he put something in: he’d carried the Webley revolver with the broken lanyard ring down the street in his briefcase, his PI at his side.

The case accounts have some major discrepancies. The trial account by the publisher of Charlottesville’s The Daily Progress gives little mention of PI Baldwin but lots of speculation about discord in the McCue household and about his philandering. Mrs. McCue had been strangled and hit with a bat before being shot, so things were messier and not quite so well planned as the PI’s account suggests.

Was there a Webley revolver and a missing lanyard swivel? The weapon that shot Mrs. McCue was a long gun owned by McCue. Was there a spider web and an incriminating jacket? That seems a bit far-fetched, even for a detective novel.

The newspaperman’s account focused on the official version of the facts, as presented at trial. The PI’s point of view was the focus of crime authors Boswell and Thompson’s account. Any event has different perspectives.

Did hiring the PI help build the case? Or was the case being solved before he arrived from Roanoke? The professional competition between PIs and police doesn’t rage only on the pages of novels, it seems.

Regardless of how the case developed, the wealthy lawyer and former mayor was perhaps the most prominent person ever hanged for murder by the Commonwealth of Virginia.

We might think of the days of phone operators as decidedly low-tech, in the days when we can track cell tower pings. But even simple technology can solve a crime—even though it may never explain the mysteries of the human mind.

References: 

Reinert: 

Costopoulos, William C. Principal Suspect: The True Story of Dr. Jay Smith and the Main Line Murders (1996).

Noe, Denise, “Two Sues and Bill,” www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/classics/mainline_murders/1.html.

Swartz-Nobel, Loretta. Engaged to Murder (1988).

Smith, Jay Charles. Joseph Wambaugh and the Jay Smith Case (2008).

Wambaugh, Joseph. Echoes in the Darkness (1987).

McCue:

Boswell, Charles and Lewis Thompson. Advocates for Murder, “The Case of the Nosy Operator,” pp. 77-94 (1962).

Lindsay, James H. The McCue Murder: Complete Story of the Crime and the Famous Trial of the Ex-Mayor of Charlottesville (1938), accessed August 2016, http://iiif.lib.harvard.edu/manifests/view/drs:5807065$11i.