Showing posts with label True Crime. Show all posts
Showing posts with label True Crime. Show all posts

Monday, September 30, 2024

The Thief, The Mapmaker, and The Alaskan Blonde: Guest Post by James T. Bartlett


I first became interested in true crimes that had a mystery element when I learned about Colonel Thomas Blood, who tried to steal the crown jewels from the Tower of London on May 9, 1671.   

The day before Blood, in disguise as a priest, had arrived at the Tower and befriended Talbot Edwards, the keeper of the crown jewels. In those days the jewels were kept in a simple cabinet with metal bars, and visitors could pay the elderly Talbot a small “compensation” to look at them. 


Blood had done this, and also dropped hints about his eligible “nephew”, knowing that Edwards had a marriageable-age daughter. However, on returning with his “nephew” that fateful day, their visit turned violent. Blood and his gang might well have escaped with the crown, scepter and orb if it was not for the sheer chance that they ran into Edwards’s son, a soldier returning home on leave, who raised the alarm.

 

Aside from the pure swashbuckling nature of this scheme, the thing that fascinated me was that Blood, in chains at the very same Tower he’d just tried to rob, asked for – and was granted – an audience with King Charles II. Soon after, the King pardoned Blood and his gang, and Blood went on to become a kind of celebrity criminal. The mystery? What on earth did Blood say or know that won him a pardon, instead of a swift execution?  

 

My next true crime obsession came soon after I moved to Belfast, Northern Ireland, where I found the name Richard Bartlett in Irish history books. The young and inexperienced Bartlett had been sent to Ireland by Queen Elizabeth I around 1601 to draw maps for her invading armies.

 

As a military cartographer he was classified as a spy, so he went disguised a bugle-playing soldier, and there are few references to him in the official records – besides his maps. His anonymity did not last however, and it was reported in 1603 that he had been captured deep in enemy territory and beheaded. The mystery? What was Richard doing alone in Tyrconnell (now Donegal), armed only with his cartographic equipment? 


I thought there was a clue in some of his maps; the later ones included personal touches like people, animals, or – daringly – had used Gaelic nomenclature and even depicted Irish homes set alight by soldiers, all of which were clear violations of protocol. Perhaps he had become disillusioned with his maps, which were being used to seize land and cripple the Spanish allies sailing to the aid of the Irish clans.

 

Both these historical mystery/crimes became screenplays, and the Richard Bartlett one saw my producer and I selected for a residential screenwriting workshop in Ballygally, a small coastal town on the Antrim coast. 


Wendall Thomas, who many of you might know as the author of the Cyd Redondo mysteries, was one of the tutors there, and, after being late for dinner on the final night, I ended up sitting next to her. The rest, appropriately enough, is literally history, but how did a daring thief and a lost cartographer lead me to Alaska?

 

My true crime book The Alaskan Blonde reexamines the murder of Cecil Wells in Fairbanks, Alaska, in October 1953, and focuses on Cecil’s wife, the main suspect in the case and the eponymous “Alaskan Blonde”. 

 

Cecil’s fifth bride, she was 20 years younger than he and notably attractive, ergo the ideal film noir-type suspect for the newspapers and pulp magazines. To them it seemed obvious that she committed the murder alongside her lover, Black musician Johnny Warren, who was indicted alongside her. Alas her story ended in suicide in Hollywood, which is how I found out about it during one of my many expeditions through the LA newspaper archives, while the murder remained a cold case that was never officially solved, nor anyone ever brought to trial. 

 

Intrigued, I started tracking down friends and family, but they all had the same question as me:  What happened? At the time it had been a taboo subject, and now these elderly men and women, great-grandparents some of them, wanted a solution to this 70-year-old mystery.

 

In the final chapter of the book, I bring together all the evidence – the police and FBI files, the interviews and the new evidence – to tell the story of that final fatal day, and so while I may not have brought Colonel Blood or Richard Bartlett to the big screen, I think I managed to solve the true crime mystery of who killed Cecil Wells.


*** 

Originally from London, James T. Bartlett is author of the National Indie Excellence Award winning and Anthony Award-nominated true crime book The Alaskan Blonde: Sex, Secrets, and the Hollywood Story that Shocked America.

 

As a travel and lifestyle journalist and historian, he has written for the Los Angeles Times, BBC, San Francisco Chronicle, Thrillist, ALTA California, Los Angeles Daily News, National Geographic Traveler, High Life, Hemispheres, Westways, Frommers, Crime Reads, American Way, Atlas Obscura and Real Crime, among others. 

 

You can find out more at www.thealaskanblonde.com

Monday, July 22, 2024

Razor Girl: True Crime Guest Post by Cathy Pickens


The newspaper headline screamed in large typeface: 


“Jealous Wife Uses Razor to Slay Husband. 

Laughs About Crime from Behind Bars of Cell. 

Head Cut Almost Off. 

‘Women and Liquor’ Blamed for Tragedy at Former Site of Camp Greene.”

A “family brawl” at a small clapboard house near a dismantled World War I boot camp became one of Charlotte, North Carolina’s trials of the century—thanks to the bubbly, chatty, tiny young defendant who admitted almost decapitating her bigamous husband. The case had everything 1920’s news headlines craved: a female killer, a gruesome murder, illegal liquor, a flirty woman with a scandalously bobbed haircut, a philandering husband, high-profile lawyers and erudite experts showing off new science. 

By the 1920s, Charlotte had been through a dramatic transformation from small inland transportation hub set at the crossroads of two major Native American trading trails to the largest textile mill center in the region, stealing the title “largest city” from the regional ports of Wilmington and Charleston, South Carolina. The large factories attracted workers and their families from piedmont and mountain farms in every direction.

As with other industrializing cities in the U.S., newcomers moving in found hard work—which they were used to on the farm—but steadier, if meager, pay and usually more modernized housing. In addition to their work ethic, rural folks brought with them skills for making or connections back home for obtaining moonshine—good to have during Prohibition. And more people congregating in town meant more opportunities for speakeasies or “blind tigers” and partying, debauchery and crime.

Nineteen-year-old Nellie Greene Freeman earned $15 a week working ten- to twelve-hour days at Charlotte’s Nebel Knitting Mill making silk hosiery. She had married twenty-one-year-old Alton Freeman only five months earlier, not knowing he was already twice-married (though not divorced) and not knowing he would seldom be gainfully employed. The newlyweds had no alternative but to live in the same house with Alton’s family. 

On May 22, 1926, Alton told Nellie he was going to pull off a liquor heist to get a stake. She didn’t like that idea. Fine, he said as he packed his bag. He would leave her. She tried to sweet talk him out of his angry bravado, but he “answered by a hiss” and said, “I hate you.”

Later, inside her cell at the police station, Nellie wasn’t at all reticent about describing to reporters what happened. She had a folded straight razor in her dress pocket. “I slipped it into my hand, threw my arms around his neck and cut him.” The newspaper printed her comments on the front page the day after the killing. “I didn’t intend to kill him,” she said. “I just meant to teach him a lesson.”

When Rural Policeman R.W. Goforth arrived at the house, he found Alton Freeman dead on the kitchen floor; “his head appeared to be completely severed except for a small portion of skin and flesh in the back of the neck.” Nellie was allowed to change out of her bloody dress before she, her dress and her straight razor were taken downtown.

The newspaper reported the next day that, by “a strange trick of fate,” Nellie shared a cell with “pretty Georgia Inge,” who was under arrest for being publicly drunk and for having a pint of illegal alcohol tucked in the “bosom of her dress.” She had threatened a $40,000 lawsuit for the humiliation of being searched (about $700,000 today) and to do away with herself rather than serve a thirty-day term in the Mecklenburg Industrial Home. However, despite her well-bred upbringing, Miss Inge was “not perturbed because of sharing her quarters with a slayer.” Six months later, at the end of her six-month sentence, Miss Inge married a young man well-known about town, and the city paper reported the nuptials held at, of all places, the Mecklenburg Industrial Home. 

By the time of former cellmate Georgia Inge’s wedding, Nellie’s tribulations too had passed. From her arrest in May to her trial in July, she spent time chatting with visiting reporters, singing and dancing in her cell and alternately laughing and crying as she studied a box of family photos.

State’s attorney Frank McNinch—a former city mayor, the brother of a former mayor and soon to be head of the Federal Trade Commission—had vowed to see the end of women getting away with murder, as had happened in a recent case of a wife wielding an ax on her abusive husband. Nellie, though, had attracted some of the best defense lawyers in town, no matter she couldn’t afford to pay them. They brought in a psychiatrist or “alienist” who testified that Nellie was little more than a child who hadn’t intended to hurt her husband and who had no idea what had happened until after it was over. “I think she is shot through and through with unsoundness,” said Dr. James K. Hall. “Her mental condition would become more unsound under stress.” 

Nellie remained calm throughout, even during her own testimony and cross-examination. Describing her “bobbed hair and flashing brown eyes,” the headlines captured the essence of her testimony: “‘I didn’t have it in my heart to kill him. I wanted to teach him a lesson and make him a better man,’ diminutive child-widow dramatically tells court jury.”

In a sweltering July courtroom, the all-male jury deliberated into a second day. The first vote had been split: one for second-degree murder, four for manslaughter and seven for acquittal. Returning to deliberate for a second day, they shared some Bible verses on forgiveness and the holdouts came around. They agreed that she’d been temporarily insane and therefore was not guilty.

After the verdict, Nellie announced that she was “through with men,” and she left town to stay with relatives in Kentucky. The judge allowed her to take her razor and her dress with her.

Almost a century later, journalist David Aaron Moore reported that one year after her trial, Nellie remarried, returned to Charlotte and began a life raising their three children, attending church and taking care of her husband and home in northwest Charlotte. She died on May 22, 1969, at age 64, after more than forty years of a quiet, happy marriage.

In 2013, her son Robert told the journalist about trolley rides his mom would take him and his siblings on to visit an older couple on the north side of Charlotte. “I remember we visited a few times. I never knew their names, but there seemed to be a genuine affection between them. I’m convinced that was the Freemans”—Alton’s parents or family.

Over time, Charlotte’s textile mills closed or moved overseas, and the abandoned Nebel Knitting Mill became the Spaghetti Warehouse restaurant in 1991, one of the first businesses to begin the transformation of the old warehouse and mill districts. Southern chivalry slowly vanished, and women eventually earned the right to be tried equally for their crimes without solicitous treatment or the convenience of being struck temporarily crazy as a viable defense. Newspapers stopped reporting trials with scintillating detail—and courtrooms got air-conditioning. When Nellie died over forty years after the trial, few in Charlotte knew that the wife and mother living in the Enderly Park neighborhood was the woman whose trial had packed a humid July courtroom and attracted hot-dog vendors and sellers of commemorative Nellie Freeman straight-razor pins. 

Old crimes can do more than recount just another ordinary, oft-repeated domestic tragedy. Historic cases can illustrate where a city or a region started, how it changed, how its crimes were shaped by the city—and how its crimes in turn shaped the city’s unique flair or flavor.

But old crimes can too easily disappear, taking with them a glimpse into how people loved and fought, survived or died, made their way or wasted their chances. Without the efforts of journalists like David Aaron Moore and research librarians like Shelia Bumgarner at the Charlotte Library, Nellie’s story could have disappeared beneath the continual accumulation of later “crimes of the century.” Likely no one would remember Razor Girl, but her case aptly highlights that time in the 1920s when young women started to move away from their families to find work in factories, and bobbed their hair and shortened their hemlines. Cities were growing, Prohibition took partying to a criminal level, criminal court reporters chatted with defendants in their cells and shared details about what female defendants wore to trial. Those reading the newspapers—and even small cities had more than one—could feel as though they had a seat on the front row.

I was one of those young women who moved from a small town to Charlotte forty years ago. I’ve written about countless crime cases in the Carolinas and across the South, but of all the stories, Razor Girl is still the “old crime” that speaks the most about where Charlotte came from and what we tend to forget, a century later.

 

References

 

“Jealous Wife Uses Razor to Slay Husband.” Charlotte Observer, May 23, 1926, 1, 11.
 
Moore, David Aaron. “The story of Nellie Freeman, aka ‘Razor Girl.’” Creative Loafing, Sept. 9, 1927. http://clclt.com/theclog/archives/2013/09/27/question-the-queen-city-the-story-of-nellie-freeman-aka-razor-girl.
 
Pickens, Cathy. Charlotte True Crime Stories. History Press, 2020.
 
“‘Razor Girl’ is Freed: Nellie Freeman Calm as She Hears Verdict Long Delayed By Jury; Jury Reaches Verdict After Many Prayers.” Charlotte News, July 20, 1926, 1.


****

 

Cathy Pickens is the author of the Blue Ridge Mountain Mysteries (Joffe Books) and a History Press series on Carolina true crime stories, including Charlotte, Raleigh, the Outer Banks, and the Western North Carolina mountains. She writes a continuing column on True Crime for Mystery Readers Journal

  

Wednesday, August 2, 2023

Penzler Publishers Announces “Crime Ink”: True Crime Imprint

Otto Penzler announced that he has formed Crime Ink, a new imprint at his publishing company, Penzler Publishers, which will focus on publishing literary true crime.

Tom Wickersham, formerly the manager of The Mysterious Bookshop, will head the imprint as its editor. Charles Perry will be the Publisher, a position he currently holds with The Mysterious Press, American Mystery Classics, Scarlet, and MysteriousPress.com, an electronic book publisher--the other imprints of Penzler Publishers. Luisa Smith will oversee as Editor-in-Chief of Penzler Publishers. 
 
The Crime Ink imprint plans to publish four to six books in its first year, starting in the Winter of 2024.

“True crime is an important publishing category that has enjoyed a long history of success,” said Otto Penzler, CEO of Penzler Publishers. “When Tom Wickersham agreed to join us in this venture, his extraordinary knowledge in this field immediately convinced me that we had a great addition to our team that would prove to be innovative and successful.”

“I am excited to join Penzler Publishers and contribute to the rich genre of true crime with Crime Ink,” said Tom. “We are poised to launch in the spring of 2024 with The Serial Killer’s Apprentice, the first modern examination of 1970s serial killer Dean Corll. Also under contract are a biography of New York crime journalist Jimmy Breslin, a comprehensive account of the Son of Sam killings, and a series in translation from France. We will strive to publish revelatory works that shed new light on old cases, expose modern injustices, and expand the classification of true crime as we know it.” 

Crime Ink will be distributed by W. W. Norton and Company, which also distributes The Mysterious Press, Scarlet, and American Mystery Classics. 


Thursday, June 15, 2023

FATHER'S DAY MYSTERIES // FATHER'S DAY CRIME FICTION

Father's Day: A day to celebrate Dad. 
My father was the ultimate reader. His idea of a great vacation was sitting in a chair reading a good mystery. It didn't mattered where he was, the book took him miles away --and he was comfortable!

Even now after he's been gone for many years, I find myself finishing a book and saying to myself, "I have to send this to Dad. He'll love it." It always makes me sad to remember I can't. My father engendered my love of mysteries through his collection of mystery novels and Ellery Queen Mystery Magazines. I like to think he's up there somewhere in a chair surrounded by books, reading a good mystery.

This year I've included True Crime, as well as fiction, on my Father's Day list. I've also included more Short Stories and a Graphic Novel. And, of course, I've updated the fiction list. Let me know any titles that you think should be included.

FATHER'S DAY MYSTERIES

Father’s Day by John Calvin Batchelor
Father’s Day by Rudolph Engelman
Father's Day: A Detective Joe Guerry Story by Tippie Rosemarie Fulton
Father’s Day Keith Gilman 
Dear Old Dead by Jane Haddam
The Father’s Day Murder by Lee Harris
Day of Reckoning by Kathy Herman
Dead Water by Victoria Houston
Father’s Day Murder by Leslie Meier
On Father's Day by Megan Norris
Father’s Day by Alan Trustman

Murder for Father, edited by Martin Greenberg (short stories)
"Father's Day" by Patti Abbott --short story at Spinetingler
Collateral Damage: A Do Some Damage Collection  e-book of Father's Day themed short stories.
"Where's Your Daddy?" by Sue Ann Jaffarian

Let me know if I missed any titles.

**
And a list of Crime Fiction that focuses on Fathers and Sons and Fathers and Daughters. Have a favorite Father / Son Father/Daughter Mystery? Post below in comments or send me a note.



FATHERS AND SONS and FATHERS AND DAUGHTERS in CRIME FICTION

Carriage Trade by Stephen Birmingham
His Father's Son by Tony Black
Her Father's Secret by Sara Blaedel
The Guest Room by Chris Bohjalian
The Lonely Witness by William Boyle
The Controller by Matt Brolly
All Things Cease to Appear by Elizabeth Brundage
Secret Father by James Carroll
The Emperor of Ocean Park by Stephen L. Carter
The President's Daughter by Bill Clinton & James Patterson
The Hasidic Rebbe's Son by Joan Lipinsky Cochran
Hot Plastic by Peter Craig
The Marsh King's Daughter by Karen Dionne 
The Poacher's Son by Paul Doiron
Killings by Andre Dubus
The Perfect Father by Charlotte Duckworth
Lars and Little Olduvai by Keith Spencer Felton
The Dead Daughter by Thomas Fincham
Unsub by Meg Gardner   
The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon
The Dead Fathers Club by Matt Haig
Gnosis by Rick Hall
Atticus by Ron Hansen
King of Lies by John Hart
Damage by Josephine Hart
The Good Father by Noah Hawley
1922; The Shining by Stephen King
Revival Season by Bharti Kirchner    
Cold in July by Joe R. Lansdale
A Perfect Spy by John LeCarre 
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
I Let You Go by Clare Mackintosh
Darksight by D.C. Mallery
Eileen by Ottessa Moshfegh
Blood Grove by Walter Mosley 
The Son by Jo Nesbo
Beijing Payback by Daniel Nieh
Ali Cross: Like Father, Like Son by James Patterson
The President's Daughter by James Patterson & Bill Clinton
Sherlock Holmes Dark Son, Dark Father by John Pirillo
The Godfather by Mario Puzo
The Roman Hat Mystery; other novels by Ellery Queen (Manfred B. Lee and Frederic Dannay)
My Son, the Murderer by Patrick Quentin
Paperback Original by Will Rhode
The Senior Sleuths: Dead in Bed by Marcia Rosen
Baby's First Felony by John Straley
The Father by Anton Swenson
City on the Edge by David Swinson
To Die in California by Newton Thornburg
The Twelve Lives of Samuel Hawley by Hannah Tinti
Father's Day by Simon Van Booy
The Second Son by Jordan Wells
The Ones Who Do by Daniel Woodrell 

True Crime: So very, very dark! Disturbing...but a new category on the list!

Incident at Big Sky by Johnny France and Malcolm Mcconnell
Fatal Vision by Joe McGinniss
Murder in Little Egypt by Darcy O'Brien
If I Can't Have Them by Gregg Olsen
The Poison Tree by Alan Prendergast
Above Suspicion; Death Sentence by Joe Sharkey
Fred & Rose by Howard Sounes

Short Stories: 

"Father's Day" by Michael Connelly in Blue Murder
A Holiday Sampler by Christine Collier
Where's Your Daddy? (Holidays from Hell Short Story Series) by Sue Ann Jaffarian
Murder for Father, Edited by Martin Greenberg, stories by Ruth Rendell, Ed Gorman, Max Allan Collins, Bill Crider and more

Graphic Novels:

Father's Day by Mike Richardson, Illustrated by Gabriel Guzman



Tuesday, April 25, 2023

GETTING AWAY WITH MURDER: Guest Post by Stephanie Kane

Stephanie Kane:

 
Is it harder to get away with murder now than, say, fifty years ago? Put another way, why are so many decades-old cold cases suddenly being solved? The most obvious answer is familial DNA, the gene-tracing tool that seems to have turned anyone with a computer and an ancestry.com subscription into a crime buster. But it’s not just genealogy. In the crime-solving arena, technological advances, from security cameras to surveillance videos to cellphone data, have been gamechangers too.
 
Forensic science has a long and colorful history. 
 
In the 700s in China, fingerprints were first used to verify the identity of documents. In 1248, a Chinese text described how to distinguish drowning from strangulation. In 1784, Englishman John Toms was convicted of murder based on physically matching the torn edge of a wad of newsprint in a pistol with a piece of newsprint in his pocket. In the next two centuries the microscope was invented, fingerprints were scanned into computers, and DNA databases were established. Each innovation made it harder to get away with crime.
 
In 2005, tracing metadata in a floppy disk that was sent to a news station back to a computer at a church was how Dennis Rader, the BTK killer, was caught. In 2020, Joseph DeAngelo, the Golden State Killer, was the first murderer to be nabbed through forensic genealogy. Genetic DNA, security cameras, surveillance videos and cellphone data all played roles in Bryan Kohberger’s arrest for murdering four Idaho college students in 2022. And who could forget the cellphone video Alex Murdaugh’s son Paul took of his dad moments before he killed Paul? Not the jury that convicted Murdaugh of murder in 2023.
 
Of the who, what, when, where and why required to prove a crime, some of the most dramatic changes have related to time. With implications for alibi and time of death, establishing when a murder occurred is crucial to identifying the killer and securing a conviction. But time is only as reliable as the means by which it is measured. As the case of Betty Frye illustrates, when was significantly harder to prove fifty years ago. Engaged (and later married) to Betty’s son, I had a front row seat to how those challenges played out then and in her cold case thirty years later. 
 
Betty, a Denver-area housewife, was bludgeoned to death in June 1973. Her body was found in her suburban garage, sprawled facedown near barrels of loot taken from the house. It looked like a burglary gone wrong, but attention soon turned to her husband Duane. The case against Duane turned on proving he was home when Betty was killed. It would pit wristwatches against alarm clocks and radio DJs, and ultimately turn on an unexpectedly unimpeachable source. 
 
The first challenge was proving Betty’s time of death. When she was attacked, she fell onto her left hand and the crystal face of her watch cracked. The watch stopped at 10:03. In 1973, a jeweler examined the watch and found no internal damage; because it needed to be cleaned, he thought it had been running intermittently, stopping and starting again, before she was killed. Ignoring the watch, and without measuring rigor or livor mortis, or taking Betty’s temperature at the crime scene or the morgue, in 1973 the coroner inexplicably concluded she died around noon. Luckily, there was other evidence. 
 
Betty had eaten breakfast around 8:30 a.m. She was last seen alive by Randy Peterson, a carpenter on a roof with a bird’s-eye view of the Frye backyard, who saw her shake out her mop. Randy thought it was 10:00 a.m. because, shortly after, he lost a contact lens. After scrambling around on the ground looking for it, he got his glasses from his car. The dashboard clock said 10:10 or 10:12 a.m.
 
Based on Randy’s sighting, and remnants of meat found in her stomach, in 2006 the cold case coroner concluded Betty died at 10:30 a.m. at latest. Digestion stops at death, and Betty died within minutes of being attacked. The meat in her stomach established she died an hour or two after breakfast.
 
Randy also saw a man who looked like Duane come out the back of the Frye garage, ten or twenty minutes before the DJ on Randy’s radio announced it was 11:30 a.m. This tallied with the most graphic and chilling evidence in the case: a clock-radio, an alarm clock and a kitchen clock found with the loot in the garage. Frozen at 11:22, 11:23 and 11:27 a.m. when the killer unplugged them to stash them in the barrels by Betty’s body, their GoPro-like documentary of the killer’s minute-by-minute trek through the house became a linchpin of the case. But the cops still needed to place Duane at the scene. 
 
Enter a thirteen-year-old kid. 
 
Bret Wacker was best friends with Duane’s youngest son, Greg. Bret lived on the next block, a three-minute walk. The morning Betty was killed, he wanted Greg to go with him to the 7-Eleven. He rang the Frye doorbell twice before Duane answered. Bret insisted this happened shortly after 11:30 a.m. If Bret was right, according to the clocks in the garage, Duane’s house was being burglarized while Duane was answering his own front door.
 
Bret was certain of the time because he’d been watching The Monkees on TV and switched the channel to Sherlock Holmes for his brother right before he left. Bret told his mother he’d be home in an hour, and she looked at the clock and thought, he better be back by 12:30. But to corroborate Bret’s testimony, the cops needed an unimpeachable source. They found one close at hand: that week’s T.V. GuideThe Monkees ran from 11:00 a.m. to 11:30 on local Channel 9, and Sherlock Holmes began at 11:30 on Channel 2.
 
Is it harder to get away with murder now? Technology has changed the landscape, but some things never change: Killers make mistakes, and dedicated cops work with whatever they have. Who needs a time-stamped cellphone video if you’ve got TV Guide?

***

Stephanie Kane
 is a lawyer and award-winning author of seven crime novels and one true crime memoir. After graduating from law school, she was a corporate partner at a top Denver law firm before becoming a criminal defense attorney. She has lectured on money laundering and white-collar crime in Eastern Europe and given workshops throughout the country on writing technique.

Her crime novels have won a Colorado Book Award for Mystery and two Colorado Authors League Awards for Genre Fiction. She belongs to the Mystery Writers of America, Rocky Mountain Fiction Writers, and the Colorado Authors League.

In True Crime Redux (May 2, 2023) Kane revists the murder of her then mother-in-law-to-be Betty Frye shortly before Kane and her fiancé’s wedding and how the dramatic events forever fractured the lives of the Frye family — and her own. 

Tuesday, July 12, 2022

TRUE CRIME: NAVIGATING RESEARCH ROADBLOCKS: Guest Post by J.L. Abramo

J.L. Abramo: True Crime: Naviating Research Roadblocks

On January 30, 2003, an article in a daily newspaper caught my eye. The piece reported the arrest of a 69-year-old man at his home just miles from where I lived at the time in Columbia, South Carolina.

   Ten years earlier, in a box of used books purchased at a yard sale, I came across a book by a prison inmate—written while he awaited execution. 

   Those two discoveries stimulated my interest and imagination, and subsequent investigations have led me here. 

   Homeland Insecurity, on one hand, is the story of two men accused of taking the lives of three fellow human beings. 

   A fifteen-year-old schoolgirl in Mahwah, New Jersey.

   And two young police officers in El Segundo, California.

   Two killers born 8 days apart in 1934. 

   Two men who died 57 days apart in 2017. 

   Crimes committed 140 days apart in 1957. 

   At a time when Americans were beginning to feel less and less confident about the safety of their families. 

   One convicted murderer spent nearly fifteen years on death row at New Jersey State Prison in Trenton—where he continually professed his innocence. 

   The other perpetrator escaped identification for more than 45 years.

   At the same time, Homeland Insecurity is an account of the hits and misses of the law enforcement agencies and legal institutions which—over the course of nearly five decades—eventually stumbled upon justice. 

   Finally, it is a look at the post-World War II American experience leading up to the murders in 1957, and the profound changes to come after. 

   When Rock & Roll, rebels without a cause, and catchers in the rye burst upon the American scene. 

   When the fear of nuclear annihilation and real-life scary monsters crept into the national consciousness. 

   And when those three murders in 1957, and a growing sense of national insecurity, may have had mutual effect.

   In researching the murder of Victoria Zielinski in March of 1957, I ran into a number of roadblocks. My interest was originally stimulated by the 1968 book, Brief Against Deathwritten by eleventh-year death row inmate, Edgar Smith. The book described the crime, his arrest, arraignment, indictment, trial and conviction—posed questions about the jury’s guilty verdict—and gained Smith a powerful advocate, William F. Buckley Jr.


   Research on the crime and its immediate aftermath relied heavily on Smith’s accounts (taken with a grain of salt and held up to scrutiny by other sources)— media and police reports from the time of the murder—and on trial transcripts.

   It wasn’t until after Smith’s discharge from prison after nearly fifteen years that he wrote a follow-up book, Getting Out, describing subsequent events—and the many appeals to state and federal courts, and to the Supreme Court, which ultimately led to his freedom in 1972.  It took me quite some time to locate a copy of Getting Out, and much longer to learn of Smith’s fate after his release.


 

   I navigated around that roadblock by writing to William F. Buckley in 1995. Buckley graciously responded to my inquiry with a somewhat shocking update on Edgar Smith—he was back in prison, this time in California.

 

 

   It was another five years before, with the help of an attorney acquaintance in California, I discovered the whereabouts of Edgar Smith. I wrote him a letter in 2000. He kindly replied—but apologized for not agreeing to meet me for an interview.

 

 

   After numerous denied parole appeals, Edgar Smith passed away in 1917 at the age of 83—after spending all but four of his final 60 years behind prison walls.

***

J.L. Abramo is the Shamus Award-winning author of ten novels and numerous short stories. Homeland Insecurity is his first full-length work of nonfiction. For more on the author, please visit www.jlabramo.com


 


Monday, April 9, 2018

Hell's Princess: The Mystery of Belle Gunness, Butcher of Men: Guest Post by Harold Schechter

Harold Schechter:
Hell's Princess: The Mystery of Belle Gunness, Butcher of Men

In the weeks since the publication of my book, Hell’s Princess: The Mystery of Belle Gunness, Butcher of Men, I’ve been asked a number of times how I first learned of its subject, the notorious “Lady Bluebeard” of La Porte, Indiana. Given my rapidly deteriorating memory, I’m not exactly sure, but I believe I first encountered her name in one of my favorite books, Olive Wooley Burt’s 1958 classic, American Murder Ballads and Their Stories. Among the scores of priceless ditties collected in that indispensable volume was one that began:

In old Indiana, not far from La Porte 
There once lived a woman, a home-loving sort. 
Belle wanted a husband, she wanted one bad. 
She placed in the papers a lonely-hearts ad. 

So big, mean, and ugly, she stayed to herself. 
A sharp cleaver lay on her slaughter-pen shelf. 
She was a hog-raiser, she started from scratch 
And planted each suitor in her ‘tater-patch. 

In church every Sunday you’d see pious Belle, 
The Devil’s own daughter, the Princess of Hell. 
Belle Gunness’s heaven was her slaughter-pen 
For she lived in the glory of butchering men. 

I was, of course, immediately intrigued.

My subsequent research into the Belle Gunness saga led me to conclude that she was that rarest of all psychopaths: a woman who engaged in wholesale slaughter, partly out of greed but mostly for the sheer joy of it. What made her even more unusual was the extreme savagery of her crimes. There were other female “murder fiends” in our country before Belle--Lydia Sherman, Sarah Jane Robinson, Jane Toppan. But they had all shared the traditional m.o. of female serial killers--poisoning their victims, then pretending that the deaths were due to natural causes.

Belle Gunness was different. Frighteningly different. True, most of her victims had apparently been dosed with arsenic (then readily available in the form of the popular vermicide, “Rough on Rats.”) But the corpses that were dug up on her Indiana “murder farm” hadn’t simply been dispatched with poison. They had been butchered.

A forty-two-year-old Norwegian emigrant, Belle had purchased the farm in 1902 with the insurance money she came into when her first husband, Mads Sorenson, died suddenly in convulsive agony. Moving to the small town of La Porte, she set herself up on what she liked to call “the prettiest and happiest country home in northern Indiana.” Shortly thereafter, she married a young widower, Peter Gunness. Just nine months after the nuptials, he was killed when a cast-iron sausage grinder fell from the stove top and struck him directly between the eyes while he was reaching for a shoe. At least that was Belle’s explanation. So bizarre was this story that neighbors talked openly of murder. The insurance company, however, declared her husband’s death an accident, and Belle collected another hefty payment.

That was when her homicidal career began in earnest. Over the course of the next six years, a succession of men found their way to Belle Gunness’s happy country home. Some were hired hands, brought in to help with the farm work. Others were well-to-do bachelors, lured to the farm by the classified matrimonial ads that Belle regularly took out in Norwegian newspapers throughout the Midwest.

All of them vanished without a trace.

Then, in the early morning hours of April 27, 1908, the Gunness farmhouse burned to the ground. When the blaze was finally extinguished, firemen were aghast to discover the remains of four people--three children and an adult woman--stacked like cordwood in the cellar of the incinerated house. Though badly charred, the murdered children were recognizable as the youngest of Belle’s six offspring. The fourth corpse was assumed to be that of Belle herself. Positive identification was impossible, however. The woman had been decapitated, and her head was nowhere to be found.

Suspicion immediately fell on a disgruntled farmhand named Ray Lamphere, who was charged with murder. In the meantime, searchers continued to sift through the ashes in a search for the missing head. They never found it. What they did unearth sent shockwaves throughout the nation--and earned Belle Gunness everlasting infamy as one of the most terrifying sociopaths in the annals of American crime.

A dozen butchered corpses lay buried around the property: in a rubbish pit, a privy vault, a hog lot. Most of the bodies had been carved up like a Thanksgiving turkey--head hacked off, arms removed from the shoulder sockets, legs sawed off at mid-thigh. The various pieces of each body--limbs, head, trunk--had been stuffed into separate grain sacks, sprinkled with lime, then buried.

The discovery of these atrocities turned the Gunness farmstead into an instant, macabre tourist attraction. On the Sunday following the discovery of the chopped-up corpses, an estimated sixteen thousand curiosity seekers descended on the property, some from as far away as Chicago. Whole families strolled about the place like vacationing sightseers, while hawkers did a booming business in hot dogs, lemonade, and souvenir postcards of the “murder farm.”

As to her fate, questions linger to this day. Did Lamphere--her suspected accomplice--kill her and her children for unknown reasons, then set fire to the farmhouse in an attempt to cover up his crimes? Many people believed so.

Others, however, had doubts that the charred, decapitated woman in the cellar was Belle. For one thing, the body weighed just seventy-three pounds--inordinately small, even allowing for the shrinkage that results when meat is roasted at high temperatures. Lamphere himself claimed that Belle had staged her own death, then absconded with a fortune in ill-gotten gains. For many years, sightings of the infamous “Lady Bluebeard” were reported in places across America. In the popular mind, she continued to live on, a legendary monster immortalized in story and song.

***
Harold Schechter is an American true crime writer who specializes in serial killers. He attended the State University of New York in Buffalo where his PhD director was Leslie Fiedler. He is professor of American literature and popular culture at Queens College of the City University of New York. 

In HELL’S PRINCESS: The Mystery of Belle Gunness, Butcher of Men (Little A; 4/01), the two-time Edgar Award finalist, Harold Schechter brings to life one of the strangest and most gruesome serial killings in the history of the United States. 


Monday, December 4, 2017

You Have the Right to Remain Silent: Guest Post by Clark Lohr and Timothy W. Moore

Clark Lohr & Timothy W. Moore:You Have the Right to Remain Silent….

There’s a display in the Phoenix Police Museum devoted to Ernesto Miranda, the man whose arrest led to the Miranda Decision, handed down in 1966 by the United States Supreme Court. Booking photos show a slender, well-muscled young man with pale skin, black hair, and full lips. In some images, Miranda wears black horn-rimmed glasses.

Ernesto Miranda had been in trouble since he was a teenager. He joined the Army at age eighteen, only to be dishonorably discharged on a Peeping Tom conviction.

When Phoenix PD reviewed Miranda’s RAP Sheet (Record of Arrests and Prosecutions) and then arrested him, he had already created a criminal pattern of behavior as a serial rapist, robber, and kidnapper.

Flash forward to 2014. Phoenix Police Detective Timothy W. Moore knew that 2016 would be the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Miranda Decision. He also knew that no one had actually taken the time to write the story down in detail. Moore set 2016 as his deadline to produce a true crime book about the hunt for Ernest Miranda and the court actions leading to the Miranda Decision.

Moore had read thousands of suspects their Miranda Warnings in his nearly thirty-year career. He’d started as a patrol officer, and he’d worked a wide range of detective assignments in order to round himself out by learning the many aspects of various police investigations. He’d earned a bachelor’s degree along the way and, in 2014, he was working the Violent Crimes Bureau’s Crime Gun Intelligence Squad.

Moore was also an associate director on the board of the Phoenix Police Museum, along with a host of current and retired Phoenix police officers and detectives, one of whom was Carroll Cooley, a tough, square jawed man with wide set eyes who’d retired from the Phoenix PD in 1978. Cooley and another detective named Wilfred Young had arrested Ernesto Miranda on March 13, 1963, kicking off a chain of events that resulted in the most famous Supreme Court decision in United States history.

Cooley was open to being interviewed and Moore set about getting the Miranda story right. His work with Cooley opened a door leading to many retired officers and detectives who were involved in various aspects of the Miranda story from 1962, including the detectives who investigated Miranda’s murder in 1976.

In follow-up interviews, Moore learned about Miranda’s trial, the appeals, his re-trial and his sentencing. But there was more to it. Newspaper accounts and Freedom of Information Act requests led to original documentation and court records.

Moore did additional interviews, which included a Miranda family member— retired Phoenix Police Detective David Miranda, the nephew of Ernesto. Using these interviews, coupled with Phoenix Police Department reports, court records, and the volumes of Supreme Court documentation, Moore did a draft of a book written with a unique structure.

Mirandized Nation is largely a scary true crime book that shifts points of view between Miranda, his victims, and the detectives who search for the answers that will lead them to a sick, dangerous, and persistent predator of women.

We follow Detective Cooley’s successful career, which paralleled Miranda’s criminal career. Cooley retired with the rank of captain. Miranda’s career ended in true outlaw fashion by way of a violent death.  

Mirandized Nation is also a book that uses an accessible, fast moving narrative to detail what the Supreme Court was doing at the time. They were, in fact, examining multiple cases like Miranda’s, all of which had to do with suspects’ rights, and the Miranda Decision was so named only because his was the first case of that type to arrive on their court calendar.

Moore fictionalized some of the dialog and some of the characterization of the players to facilitate the story and made use of close third person, quoting Miranda’s thoughts. Names of victims and witnesses were changed, but nothing else was invented—which, again, makes it scary. We’re with Miranda when he’s pulling out of his driveway at night to find and assault women and we know what day it is and we know what time it is—and we know it’s true. Every chapter of the book is furnished with a list of references.

With his draft completed, Tim Moore solicited the assistance of Clark Lohr, a crime novelist living in Tucson, Arizona, who possessed what Moore did not have—a degree in Writing and Literature and another in English. The two men were able to combine their research and expertise, leading to a lasting friendship and a revised draft of Mirandized Nation.

After professional editing done by Lisa Anderson, and a final editing by Deborah J. Ledford, a novelist and owner of IOF (Ice on Fire) Productions, Ltd., Mirandized Nation was published in May of 2015.

Clark Lohr lives in Tucson, Arizona. He is the author of two crime novels, Devil's Kitchen and The Devil on Eighty-five.

Timothy W. Moore retired from the Phoenix PD after a thirty-year career, most of it as a detective. Moore has an enduring marriage and two grown daughters.

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Prison Visits: Guest post by Kathryn Casey

Kathryn Casey is the author of fourteen books, her most recent POSSESSED: The Infamous Texas Stiletto Murder. In Plain Sight, on the Kaufman County prosecutor murders, is scheduled for publication by HarperCollins in early 2018. Ann Rule called Casey “one of the best in the true crime genre.”

Kathryn Casey:
Prison Visits

The door opens, and suddenly he’s there. Minutes later, he grins, his excitement palpable, as he describes the murders of four women. A crime writer’s life can take strange turns. 

I started covering sensational cases for magazines in the eighties, and it stuck. In the mid-nineties, I began writing true crime books. Eleven books later, I traveled Texas interviewing folks for Deliver Us (Harper, 2015), investigating more than two dozen unsolved murders that unfolded between 1971 and 1997 near Interstate 45, south of Houston.

I’d considered writing this particular book for some time. The cases haunted me. Over the years, I’d collected Houston Chronicle articles on the killings in a folder I kept in my desk drawer. At times, I took it out, reread them, and wondered. The murders were, after all, the ultimate mysteries, and I felt compelled to find out what happened to so many young women.

In many ways, true crime isn’t an easy life. I do an incredible amount of research, spend long weeks even months on stiff-backed wooden courthouse benches during trials, and over the years I’ve had to get used to pretty strong reactions from people I approach asking for interviews. It comes with the territory. For the most part, those involved agree to talk to me. Some, however, aren’t happy to see me when they open their doors.

As I dug into the I-45 murders, I realized that although the cases remained unsolved, there were suspects. The majority of the killings appeared to fall into three groups, divided by decades and linked by proximity. I always try to interview everyone involved, so I journeyed between five Texas prisons, where the main suspects are inmates serving long sentences for unrelated crimes. Most of the men denied they’d murdered anyone.

One glaring exception: Mark Roland Stallings.

Tall, muscular, bald, edgy, Stallings is suspected in one of the murders tied to the notorious Texas Killing Field. Between 1983 and 1991, four sets of remains were recovered from under trees in what was an overgrown oil patch, a mile from the highway. The victims included: a 23-year-old waitress, Heide Fye, a high school student, Laura Miller, and two unidentified women, Jane and Janet Doe.

While all the bodies were found in the same area, the fourth killing differed from the first three, suggesting two killers. Stallings was the prime suspect in the death of the final victim, Janet Doe.

That day I walked into the prison, I felt a familiar knot in my chest when the metal prison doors clanked shut behind me. The place was grim. Prisons pretty much all are. A special building reserved for high-risk inmates, that section of the Gib Lewis Unit struck me as even more suffocating than most. Moments after I arrived, a guard brought Stallings out and locked him in a metal cage opposite me. I felt a surge of gratitude for the thick window that separated us, as Stallings picked up the phone on his side of the Plexiglas to talk to me.

In truth, I’d assumed Stallings would claim innocence, like most of the others I’d interviewed. To my surprise, he instead recounted in vivid detail how he strangled Janet Doe and his involvement in the murders of three other women.

The experience was more than unsettling.

Most of the killers I’d interviewed in the past and since acted for some form of personal gain, money or possessions, for revenge, many to dispose of significant others who became inconvenient. While tragic, the killings had some twisted logic.

Mark Stallings murdered for a more primal reason: he enjoyed it.

I’m not new at this. I’ve heard and seen a lot over the years, but it’s hard to interact with someone like Stallings. He talked with a detached delight about his years in the Texas Killing Fields. And he didn’t blame himself or hold himself accountable for his crimes. Instead, he felt justified. The women were at fault. They were troubled. They were disposable.

Why write a book on men who commit such horrific crimes? For one reason: to understand.

More than any other aspect, I’ve always been interested in the psychology of the cases I cover, and as we talked, Stallings recounted a common history for serial killers, one involving childhood sexual abuse and early experiences that mixed sex and violence.

While his history didn’t in any way mitigate his abhorrent crimes, perhaps it explained some of the volcanic rage that consumed him.


Monday, March 6, 2017

TCM March Spotlight: TCM Villains 3/20-3/25

TCM SPOTLIGHT: Villains: March Malice - 3/20-3/25

This month on TCM villains will have their due by pairing some of the most nefarious characters in 32 different categories and letting viewers decide who reigns as the worst of them all. Villains run the gamut and come in all shapes, sizes and forms.

The couplings begin with Psycho Killers Norman Bates, played with chilling perfection by Anthony Perkins in Psycho (1960); and Mark Lewis, portrayed by Carl Boehm, in Peeping Tom (1960) with a creepiness that made his movie a cult favorite. Technology Kills! covers such high-tech threats as the android gunslinger played by Yul Brynner in Westworld (1973) and HAL 9000, the spaceship computer that takes on a life of its own in 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968).

Movies featuring Western Outlaws include The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (1962), with Lee Marvin as the ruthless desperado of the title, and Hombre (1967), with Richard Boone as the marauding bandit Grimes.

True Crime gives us Martha Beck and Ray Fernandez (Shirley Stoler and Tony LoBianco), the killers of The Honeymoon Killers (1970) and Bonnie and Clyde (1967), the legendary bank robbers played by Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty.

Femmes Fatales don't come any deadlier than Phyllis Dietrichson played with icy brilliance by Barbara Stanwyck in Double Indemnity (1944); or Vera, the sultry hitchhiker brought to scary life by Ann Savage in Detour (1945).

Two Killer Kids who wreck the lives of the grownups around them are Patty McCormack's Rhoda Penmark, the little psycho of The Bad Seed (1956); and Ann Blyth's Veda Pierce, the scheming daughter of Mildred Pierce (1945).

Many Dark Forces loom large over their opponents such as Margaret Hamilton as the green-faced Wicked Witch of the West in The Wizard of Oz (1939); and Sala Baker as Sauron, the ominous Dark Lord of Mordor in The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003).

Among the classic movie Aliens Among Us are those seed pods that transform into human replicants in Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956); and that, well, thing played by James Arness in The Thing from Another World (1951).

You Animal! is a category that showcases such savage beasts as Larry Talbot, the werewolf played by Lon Chaney Jr. in The Wolf Man (1941); and Irena Dubrovna Reed, the pantheresque beauty acted by Simone Simon in Cat People (1942).

Friday, August 26, 2016

The Mid-Atlantic Does Murder: True Crimes by Cathy Pickens

Mystery Readers Journal changed up its themes for 2016, but not before our True Crime columnist Cathy Pickens submitted her column. Rather than wait until we add Mid-Atlantic Mysteries to our line-up, I thought I'd post this great article.

 Cathy Pickens’ mystery series started with the St. Martin’s Malice Domestic-award winning Southern Fried. She conducts popular workshops on developing the creative process and developed a program to teach jail inmates how to start their own businesses.

Cathy Pickens:
The Mid-Atlantic Does Murder  

In the diverse and densely populated mid-Atlantic states, what’s a better illustration of their crime history than cases open to continuing speculation?

Sex, Drugs, Rock & Roll 

In 1979, when parents enrolled their children in Philadelphia Mainline’s Upper Merion High School, they didn’t expect the kind of education or the educators they got. Bear-like Bill Bradfield, the English and Latin teacher, had a live-in teacher-girlfriend, plus other girlfriends (some married) for added entertainment.

The principal, Dr. Jay Smith, was an Army Reserve colonel with a rigid manner and subscriptions to swinger and porn magazines.

In a swirl of sexual experimentation and drama, free love became establishment at Upper Merion High School.

What created such a bubbling stew of sexual intrigue? A sign of the ‘70s? A confluence of personalities around a master manipulator?

It was all fun and games until someone ended up dead in a car trunk.

The body of English teacher Susan Reinert, wrapped in chains, was found in her car trunk in the parking lot of a Harrisburg grocery store. The story exploded over national news as the tangled facts slowly unwound: Reinert had divorced her husband, was having an affair with fellow teacher Bradfield, who was living with yet another teacher. Her young children—ages 10 and 11—were missing and, tragically, have never been found. Reinert had been beaten and later injected with a fatal dose of morphine.

Was Bill Bradfield a pied piper of perversion? Many who followed the case thought so.

Was principal Smith—the military man—a hired killer? Or a deranged man seeking vengeance on a quiet teacher for unnamed reasons? He had, after all, been convicted of robbing two Sears stores, disguised as an armored car guard.

Was Reinert killed for the $700,000 life insurance policy benefitting Bradfield? Did Smith, living out a macho fantasy, commit the murder or was his involvement just another Bradfield con job?

Two books (one written by Joseph Wambaugh), a TV movie, and a memoir written by principal Jay Smith rehashed the details, but the motives remain murky.

Did Wambaugh’s involvement skew the investigation and the trial results? An appellate court believed it might. Documents later found in the effects of a state trooper who investigated the case showed that Wambaugh had paid at least one officer more than a trooper’s annual salary for inside information on the investigation.

Smith’s attorney William Costopoulos got him off death row after six years, then got him out of prison. The court held the prosecution had withheld evidence possibly helpful to Smith and thereby created double jeopardy. Smith could never be retried.

Did Smith kill Reinert? He says no, in a self-published book detailing the holes he saw in the prosecution case. Smith died in 2009 at age 80.

Was Bradfield a gifted con artist who found the right pawns and victims all gathered in one place? Was he also a murderer? Or simply the orchestra leader? He was at Cape May with other teachers during that deadly holiday weekend. Did any of his companions conspire with him? Did he hire a murderous thug (with money he’d supposedly invested for Susan Reinert but which he’d kept)?

In 1998, Bradfield died in prison at age 64, fifteen years into his sentence. After weaving lots of wild stories about how Smith was going to kill Reinert and how he didn’t know she’d left him her insurance policy, Bradfield remained quiet about what really happened. Despite books and movies and loads of speculation, the facts remain a mystery—at surely one of the wildest high school English departments ever.

High Tech—1904-Style 

In 1904, decades before the classic hardboiled P.I. novel debuted, a murder mystery suited for a twisty crime novel unfolded in Charlottesville, Virginia.

J. Samuel McCue, former mayor of Charlottesville and a successful lawyer, returned home from church one evening with his wife.

He’d started upstairs, then turned to get something he’d left downstairs. His wife Fannie continued past him up the stairs—where she met a masked man with a gun. In the dim light, he shot her, ran downstairs, and smashed out a large back window to escape.

Former mayor McCue had little faith in the police chief, so he sought help from Roanoke private investigator W. G. Baldwin. The PI surveyed the scene—the upstairs landing where she died, the shattered window, the torn spider web outside the window where the gunman had escaped.

As Baldwin examined the ground outside the window, he saw the glint of metal—a small ring with a broken screw attached, the lanyard ring from a gun.

While Baldwin searched, McCue was in his study packing his briefcase. Even in his grief, he couldn’t ignore clients who needed him. He also needed to stop by the bank, he told Baldwin, to get his will from the safe deposit box. His wife—and only heir—was now dead, so he needed to change his will. He was a lawyer, after all. Such details were his bread and butter.

PI Baldwin accompanied him on his walk to the bank, on his way to see the police chief.

The chief handed Baldwin the unusual bullets taken from Mrs. McCue’s body.

Back at McCue’s office, Baldwin asked him the delicate but obvious question: Do you have any enemies? You were first on the stairs. The bullets were meant for you.

McCue named two men with whom he’d had difficulties, including Reginald Evans, who’d accused McCue of seducing his wife while meeting with her about divorcing Evans.

As any devoted detective would, McCue followed the leads. Mrs. Evans was indeed a looker, but the Evanses had reconciled.

McCue then went to the telephone office to call a gun expert about the odd bullets and the lanyard ring. He chatted up Miss Virginia Bragg, the telephone operator, then continued to follow leads to their dead-ends.

Later, Miss Bragg called him at his hotel to report an unusual phone call former mayor McCue had placed. As she checked to make sure the call connected properly, she’d heard just enough: a woman telling McCue to “send the money now.”

Baldwin, suspecting blackmail, asked Miss Bragg to find out who and where McCue was calling.

He then visited his client and asked if he had any personal skeletons he needed to tell him about. McCue drew himself up in all his Victorian dignity: “Certainly not.”

Baldwin quickly cracked the case: thanks to the lead from Miss Bragg, Baldwin found that McCue had a beautiful woman stashed in a Washington hotel—none other than Hattie Evans.

Mr. Evans was an Englishman and owned an English Webley revolver. The bullets and the lanyard ring both came from a Webley revolver—an unusual weapon for anyone in that area to own. Evans said his revolver had disappeared from his desk.

Hattie Evans told Baldwin she’d given McCue her husband’s gun, afraid her husband might act on his jealous suspicions and do something foolish.

Baldwin searched his client’s house for the revolver. He found a dusty envelope in McCue’s desk: McCue’s Last Will and Testament. Going through jacket pockets in McCue’s closet, he found no gun but did get his fingers tangled up in fibers stuck on one jacket. He carefully folded the jacket and took it with him.

He asked the police chief what McCue was wearing the night of his wife’s murder. The chief described the jacket Baldwin had taken from the closet—the jacket with the sticky spider web on it. The killer had run through a spider web escaping through the garden window.

Why did McCue hire Baldwin to “solve” his wife’s murder? For the same narcissistic reason he walked with his PI to visit his safe deposit box. McCue didn’t go there to get his will—that was dusty and stuffed in a desk drawer at home. He didn’t get anything out. Instead, he put something in: he’d carried the Webley revolver with the broken lanyard ring down the street in his briefcase, his PI at his side.

The case accounts have some major discrepancies. The trial account by the publisher of Charlottesville’s The Daily Progress gives little mention of PI Baldwin but lots of speculation about discord in the McCue household and about his philandering. Mrs. McCue had been strangled and hit with a bat before being shot, so things were messier and not quite so well planned as the PI’s account suggests.

Was there a Webley revolver and a missing lanyard swivel? The weapon that shot Mrs. McCue was a long gun owned by McCue. Was there a spider web and an incriminating jacket? That seems a bit far-fetched, even for a detective novel.

The newspaperman’s account focused on the official version of the facts, as presented at trial. The PI’s point of view was the focus of crime authors Boswell and Thompson’s account. Any event has different perspectives.

Did hiring the PI help build the case? Or was the case being solved before he arrived from Roanoke? The professional competition between PIs and police doesn’t rage only on the pages of novels, it seems.

Regardless of how the case developed, the wealthy lawyer and former mayor was perhaps the most prominent person ever hanged for murder by the Commonwealth of Virginia.

We might think of the days of phone operators as decidedly low-tech, in the days when we can track cell tower pings. But even simple technology can solve a crime—even though it may never explain the mysteries of the human mind.

References: 

Reinert: 

Costopoulos, William C. Principal Suspect: The True Story of Dr. Jay Smith and the Main Line Murders (1996).

Noe, Denise, “Two Sues and Bill,” www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/classics/mainline_murders/1.html.

Swartz-Nobel, Loretta. Engaged to Murder (1988).

Smith, Jay Charles. Joseph Wambaugh and the Jay Smith Case (2008).

Wambaugh, Joseph. Echoes in the Darkness (1987).

McCue:

Boswell, Charles and Lewis Thompson. Advocates for Murder, “The Case of the Nosy Operator,” pp. 77-94 (1962).

Lindsay, James H. The McCue Murder: Complete Story of the Crime and the Famous Trial of the Ex-Mayor of Charlottesville (1938), accessed August 2016, http://iiif.lib.harvard.edu/manifests/view/drs:5807065$11i.